Karl Marx, ethnoloyal Judaeocapitalist or self-hating Judaeotraitor?

I. Marx invented the word capitalism. Before him, we just referred to capitalists (those pig- and rat-looking guys) and referred to industrialisation as Anglo-Calvinist sorcery.

II. Marx supported capitalism in a linear approach where agrarian civilisations first overthrow the aristocratic elite in favour of a rightful Judaeomerchant elite, then a dictatorship of Jewish-led "workers" (more lumpenprole and bourg. Jews) would overthrow it. This has happened in complex ways, and that leads me to III...

III. Marxism is confusing. It's so confusing it doesn't have to make any sense to serve its purpose: (i) defeating socialism, (ii) making Jews look smart by their supporting extremely convoluted forms of it (cultural Marxism) and (iii) attacking it simplistically (Neoconservatism), framing the debate between Judaeobenevolet poles - sometimes even more than 2 poles, for instance neoliberalism ("libertarianism") posits itself as a "third position" between socialism (incorrectly equated with Marxism) and some fear of a fascistoid Christian-controlled America, which is just ridiculous, since if you've followed me to this point you realise libertarians, liberal-leftists, and conservatives all push the same Jewish candy land because the competing narratives exist for each other, complemetnary to each other. I don't agree with those who say "they're the same". If you think that, you're probably in libertarian lalaland, calling your enemies "statists" and reading your Austrian School (hint: wrong ethnicity) and Objectivist materials.

IV. All forms of Marxism (including leftist-anarchist-liberal approaches from its inception) approach totally neutralising a resistance to liberalcapitalism, and thereby giving Jews power even more important that economic: state beaurocratic positions and antihero/victim statuses that (slave) morally surround us. Marxism has only lead to capitalists victories by (i) providing a really bad alternative to liberalcapitalism and (ii) restructuring largely agrarian societies into state capitalist societies, and then finally (or lately) turning such State Capitalist entities into Neoliberal and psuedosocial market colonies of Judaeisrael.

That said, he was only half chosenrace and he seemed, on the surface anyway, some kind of Commu-Nazi (perhaps the world's first, after Jesus):

"What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time."

No wonder America hates this guy.

(update: Karl Marx was not, as I always believed, half-Jewish but fully so:

Though he seems to be rather of a classic Neareasterner than reduced Jewish type.)